Gays in the
military: The UK and US compared

Members of the military
now take part in London's annual Gay Pride march
When the UK
took the step of allowing gay men and women to serve openly in the armed forces
10 years ago, public opinion was in favour but the armed forces themselves were
not.
The
situation is very similar in the US today.
An NOP poll in September
1999 found seven out of 10 Britons believed lesbians and gay men should be
allowed to serve in the military.
At the same time General
Sir Anthony Farrar-Hockley, a leading opponent of the change, told the BBC:
"Two surveys have disclosed that the overwhelming majority of those in
military service today find homosexuality abhorrent."
In the US, a Gallup poll of
1,015 US citizens in May 2009 found 69% in favour of allowing gays to serve
openly in the armed forces - an increase of 6% over five years. Support among
"conservatives" had jumped 12% over the same period, from 46% to 58%.
But a Military Times poll
in December 2008 found a majority of active-duty respondents - 58% - were
against the idea of repealing the Don't Ask Don't Tell law.
Landmarks
Some 10% said they would
leave the armed forces if gays were allowed to serve openly.
Large-scale resignations
from the UK armed forces were widely expected in some quarters, when the ban on
gays was lifted - but in practice they did not materialise.
At least one British army
brigadier publicly resigned in protest, citing "strongly held moral and
military convictions" but most observers were surprised at how smoothly
the new law - which was forced on the UK government by the European Court of
Human Rights - was implemented.
"There was this
expectation that there would be problems, but it just didn't happen. People
just got on with their work," said Dave Small, who was in the Royal Navy
at the time, but now works for the Stonewall Diversity Champions Programme
helping the three armed services to adopt best practice in the area of sexual
diversity.
The Royal Navy joined the
programme in 2005, the RAF in 2006 and the army in 2008 - the same year it
followed the other two services in allowing servicemen and women to participate
in Gay Pride marches in uniform.
Other landmarks of the last
few years include: the first advertisements for recruits in gay-friendly press;
the first address by the head of the British army to a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual
and Transgender conference; and the first portrait of an openly gay soldier on
the front cover of Soldier magazine, the official publication of the British
Army.
'Prejudices'
Fears that allowing openly
gay soldiers to serve on the front line would lead to a breakdown of discipline
and cohesion within units also proved unfounded. It's the example of British
troops operating successfully in Iraq that has prompted the first Iraq war
veteran elected to Congress - Democratic Representative Patrick Murphy of
Pennsylvania - to campaign for a bill repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell.
British Security Minister
Lord Alan West, a former head of the Royal Navy, told the Associated Press in
July 2009 that allowing gays to serve openly was "much better".
"For countries that
don't do that - I don't believe it's got anything to do with how efficient or
capable their forces will be. It's to do with prejudices, I'm afraid," he
said.
Like the US, 10 of the 27
countries in the European Union do not allow gay people to serve openly in the
armed forces, according to the Palm Center at the University of California -
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and
Slovakia.
This is because the
European Court of Human Rights ruling that drove the UK to change its law was
the outcome of a specific case brought by four British ex-service personnel.
The ruling said that
banning gays from openly serving in the military was a violation of their right
to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights.
This means that similar
cases could be brought against other signatories to the convention, but until
then the countries are under no obligation to change their rules.